Cure for Cancer; Call to the Corporate Community

Is it possible to cure Cancer? to battle it without radioactive, money eating scandals... to combat such a malignant and complicated festering disease without complication? Despite the likelihood of one's response to be "Ridiculous!" or claims against the Pharmaceutical world who would claim otherwise, it must be understood, and I find it in me to aid one to understand that yes, yes a Cure For Cancer DOES exist... in fact, 2 non-malignant cures exist, and we are being fed... even by non-partisan corporations, such as the Canadian Cancer Society, that no such things exist. Well my seekers of truth, follow me along the passage of Enlightenment for I am here to tell of the Cure(s) that remains untold of, and I shall report it with out money-mongering or word trickery.



Sodium Dichloroacetate (otherwise known as DCA):

It was an unpatented product that came into the sights of the world approximately 2 years ago, where it was first reported. A study done at the University of Alberta led us to believe that Sodium Dichloroacetate (otherwise known as DCA)was showing exceptionally promising signs of curing Cancer, without the malignant side affects. The report was otherwise manipulative and misleading... and other than that report, none others have been done since!

To aid you in procuring further knowledge of Sodium Dichloroacetate I will give basic details about the chemical itself;
Firstly, Sodium Dichloroacetate is a non-corrosive, sodium salt derivative powder of the corrosive Dichloroacetic Acid. This product has been used SAFELY FOR DECADES to aid in the curing of such diseases as Lactic Acidosis - "Metabolic acidosis is defined as a state of decreased systemic pH resulting from either a primary increase in hydrogen ion (H+) or a reduction in bicarbonate (HCO3-) concentrations. In the acute state, respiratory compensation of acidosis occurs by hyperventilation resulting in a relative reduction in PaCO2. Chronically, renal compensation occurs by means of reabsorption of HCO3."
[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/768159-overview]
It must be dually noted that: a study done in curing Lactic Acidosis shows that in the testing "There was no evidence of toxicity to dichloroacetate."
[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3337517]

Secondly, there has been a reported issue among researchers that claim that S-DCA (Sodium Dichloroacetate), we'll call it, to separate from the related corrosive chemical DCA (Dichloroacetic acid), has a series of possibly severe side affects. Some which of being:
- Malign affects to the nervous system
- There exists a possibility that it causes cancer in animals
- It is an Environmental Pollutant
[http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/news/behindtheheadlines/dca/]
Has this UK Cancer Research facility not done the testing themselves, or as a matter of factly, looked into it more in depth?

While I cannot discover any information leading to how S-DCA is in fact an environmental concern and/or how to avoid it being so. Any claims of it's malignant affects seem proven to be false by reports done the Department of Medicine, University of Florida and the U.S. National Cancer Institute and also reported further more by the Canadian Cancer Trials. As stated before in the study of S-DCA used Lactic Acidosis victims, "There was no evidence of toxicity to dichloroacetate." reported Stacpoole PW, Lorenz AC, Thomas RG, Harman EM. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3337517]

As well as, this significant research procured by the National Cancer Institute: "Although the bioavailability was only 50-60% in normal subjects treated with 2.5 microgram/kg of DCA , in a study using clinically relevant dose of DCA at 50 mg/kg, the bioavailability was 100% in health volunteers. DCA administered at 50 mg/kg/day can achieve plasma concentrations above those require for inhibition of PHDK, the target enzyme for at least 24 hours, without exceeding the concentration for maximal lactate lowering. There was a high incidence of peripheral neuropathy in adults with MELAS after administration of DCA at 50 mg/kg/day for 6 months, but peripheral neuropathy is part of the MELAS syndrome, and many adult patients with MELAS develop diabetes mellitus, which commonly presents with peripheral neuropathy. In the contrary, no peripheral neuropathy was observed in children with congenital acidosis after prolonged treatment with DCA at 50 mg/kg/day up to 2 years. Therefore, with exclusion of patients with any grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy and with careful monitoring of peripheral neuropathy using monofilaments, the likelihood of developing severe peripheral neuropathy in adult cancer patients should be minimized. Given the presence of significant neuropathy in adult patients with MELAS after treatment with DCA at 25 mg/kg/day, it is judged to be safe and reasonable to establish the starting dose at 12.5 mg/kg/day in adult cancer patients."
[http://www.cancer.gov/search/ViewClinicalTrials.aspx?cdrid=580828&version=HealthProfessional&protocolsearchid=6908039]

And the research procured by the Canadian Cancer Trials, a partner of the Canadian Cancer Society:"Dichloroacetate (DCA) is a small molecule that has been used for years to treat lactic acidosis and rare metabolic disorders in humans. Further testing now shows that it may suppress the growth of human cancer cells. Tests of DCA on human cells cultured outside of the body found that it killed lung, breast, and brain cancer cells, without affecting human normal cells. Tumors in rats that were infected with human tumors also shrank considerably. Most cancers are characterized by a resistance to apoptosis (cell death that removes abnormal cells) that makes them more likely to grow as well as be resistant to most cancer treatments. Plus, many current cancer treatments kill both cancerous and healthy cells and are highly toxic. DCA works by reversing the damage to the mitochondria that is present in cancer cells, thus reactivating the apoptosis (cell death) mechanism in them. The result is the death of the cancer cells. This mitochondrial reactivation presents an entirely new approach to treating cancer. DCA is known to be relatively well tolerated with few significant side effects and its selectivity, effectiveness and ease of delivery (oral) make it an attractive opportunity. It is hoped that one day this treatment may become a safe and effective treatment, either alone or in conjunction with other treatments, for many forms of cancer."[http://www.canadiancancertrials.ca/trial/Default.aspx?dsEndecaNav=Ntk%3AMain_en|dca|1|%2CRo%3A0%2CNrc%3Aid-30-dynrank-disabled|id-130-dynrank-disabled|id-131-dynrank-disabled|id-132-dynrank-disabled|id-619-dynrank-disabled|id-620-dynrank-disabled|id-621-dynrank-disabled|id-622-dynrank-disabled&TrialId=NCT00566410&lang=en]
.
.
.
"Therefore, with exclusion of patients with any grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy and with careful monitoring of peripheral neuropathy using monofilaments, the likelihood of developing severe peripheral neuropathy in adult cancer patients should be minimized. Given the presence of significant neuropathy in adult patients with MELAS after treatment with DCA at 25 mg/kg/day, it is judged to be safe and reasonable to establish the starting dose at 12.5 mg/kg/day in adult cancer patients."[http://www.canadiancancertrials.ca/trial/Default.aspx?dsEndecaNav=Ntk%3AMain_en|dca|1|%2CRo%3A0%2CNrc%3Aid-30-dynrank-disabled|id-130-dynrank-disabled|id-131-dynrank-disabled|id-132-dynrank-disabled|id-619-dynrank-disabled|id-620-dynrank-disabled|id-621-dynrank-disabled|id-622-dynrank-disabled&TrialId=NCT00566410&lang=en]

This information shows us, that through human study, the product S-DCA is safe for use and should be otherwise looked into by those facing death because of Cancer.

One must now realize that Cancer CAN be fought, and without the doings of high-risk operations and procedures; such as that of Chemotherapy.
Nevertheless, I have put it upon myself to contact the Canadian Cancer Society and other Non-partisan outlets of patient support. I am awaiting upon reply, as I write this. Seek the truth, if you find a conflict within my findings please feel free to share for I am fully willing to debate any concerns that may be established because of this astounding information. For information on the sale of this product, please look into it through your own means.

Hemp Oil:

It is also a known fact that the herb Hemp acts as a powerful agent in the battle against Cancer, with again, no malignant side affects. The only issue that correlates to Hemp though is that it is an illegal substance and must be pursued at one's own risk. For further information on the usage of Hemp to prevent Cancer and other diseases follow this video link and watch the documentary created by Rick Simpson:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7331006790306000271&ei=PV7fSun7Lp76rAKGnbWGCg&q=run+from+the+cure&hl=en&client=firefox-a#

Goodluck, and may the truth guide you.

©TEMedia.

Fort Hood Shooting Not Adding Up

On the basis of recent knowledge, it has come to the attention of most (especially those pessimist driven, imaginative conspiracy theorizers) people that the Fort Hood massacre- where both soldiers and civilians suffered: known 13 deaths, and 30 injured- is a suspicious and utterly intriguing case.

The lack of initial motive with the alleged Gunman Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Islamic-American soldier, and trauma psychiatrist at Fort Hood, has led people to question the true nature of the horrific crimes. It is left to the Enlightened thinker to understand and speculate the possibility of a military 'patsy'.
The evidence leading to this gunman's motive is unclear, but to illuminate those who wish to be illuminated I must put forward the facts to which we must judge and seek the truth within the crime; for the modern media is a source of blind, misleading knowledge.

The Facts:
- Major Nidal Malik Hasan, promoted in May of 2009: it is known that he was to be recently deployed to Iraq. It has been noted by his co-workers that this caused unrest in Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan due to his Islamic background, and faith. It is also being speculated, that despite his position in the American military, and also as a psychiatrist, that he has been noted to sympathize and agree with the nature of 'suicide-bombing'. This latter notion is merely speculation and has no basis of truth to it, as of yet. He remains alive, and as reported by CNN: "is not dead as previously reported by the military" and is "in custody and in stable condition,"(http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/05/texas.fort.hood.shootings/index.html)
This can allow us to speculate that if there is grounds for conspiracy, it rests on this man to remain alive and to establish his evidence. It is hoped that no assailant murders him out of 'revenge' killing or possible outside influence.
Not only so, but it is claimed by his Banker Aunt, Noel Hassan, and cousin, that the Major wanted out of the military due to discrimination against his Islamic faith since the 9-11 attacks and has attempted to escape the military to the point of offering to pay back medical school costs to the U.S. military, as claimed by his banker Aunt...(http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6706332.html) this comes directly into conflict with his recent promotion. Why would the United States Military promote Nidal Malik Hasan, if he is otherwise suffering from unhappiness with his military position and duties? Why would Nidal Malik Hasan apply to be promoted also, knowing full well he is, as according to his Aunt, pleaing with money to be discharged from the military? It must be taken into consideration Noel Hasan's banking branch and associated work with the Federal Government.
It is also claimed that during the fire fight, Maj. Hasan is noted for screaming the phrase "Allahu Akbar" which means, in Arabic, "God is Great". (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6706442.html)

- 2 other gunmen were detained along with the Major, but have been released under circumstances the public has no knowledge of. It is assumed that a series of cross-fire was the initial value of these soldiers being detained, but it should be noted that the reports claim that no one other than police who came to the scene were equipped with firearms to combat the assailant. Thus one must assume how this indicates that they were detained under the value of some form of cross-fire. It must also be noted that more than 1 shooter have been otherwise reported. Not only so, but the gunman was equipped with 2 handguns, and fired up to but not limited to 100 rounds. (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6706442.html) This is quite a substantial article of evidence that one must question in the face of illumination. How is it logical that the assailant, equipped with 2 handguns was able to fire off at least 100 rounds?

Though, I share my deepest sympathy to the victims who have lost their lives and families, who must remain to suffer because of this monstrosity; one must see past the manipulated media and organize the facts with their own judgment. Thus it must be taken into account that despite videos of Maj. Hasan's friendly nature in early hours of the day, and his quiet gentle nature over all, that it is quite questionable in relation to the circumstances that are taking place... Hopefully the future evidence to come from the injured victims and alleged assailant will be transparent and allow us to view the truth, otherwise, this case is a matter of large speculation and must be understood and the value of it's potential nature must be discovered.

©TEMedia.

Thanks For the Wimsicle Shout Outs... Now Onto the Rampage.

This video shows Barack Obama's response to the Fort Hood murders. The abundance of indecency in the introduction is unpleasant.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0hiw8iXdMM

Let us take note of his lack of initial compassion and sympathy. Our hope for the once well-respected Barack Obama, former Senator of Illinois, is slowly slipping away.

©TEMedia.